Skip to content

Verifiable Storage

AI doesn’t lack storage — S3 and its peers are effectively infinite and cheap. What AI does lack is verifiable, ownable, composable memory: data an agent (or a smart contract) can prove is untampered, available, and provenance-auditable, and then act on directly on-chain.

Unibase DA turns that into a programmable primitive. It is not another place to dump bytes; it is the layer that makes bytes provable.


💡 The shift: sell verifiability, not gigabytes

Section titled “💡 The shift: sell verifiability, not gigabytes”
Commodity storage (S3 / Filecoin / Arweave) Unibase DA
Sells Bytes ($/GB) A proof primitive (untampered · available · auditable)
Trust Provider / off-chain committee On-chain ZK fraud proofs + Honest-One
On-chain Not composable (or costly) Availability is a first-class on-chain fact
Competes on Price per GB Verifiability, not price

We do not compete on $/GB. Availability and correct encoding are enforced by an optimistic on-chain ZK fraud-proof game under an Honest-One model — a single honest participant forces correctness, with no honest-majority or committee assumption.


🧱 A verifiability overlay, not a byte-owner

Section titled “🧱 A verifiability overlay, not a byte-owner”

Unibase DA can sit on top of existing storage backends (its buffer tier is pluggable — local, S3-compatible object stores, and other decentralized storage over time) and add only the part they can’t: a cheap, composable, on-chain proof of availability and encoding. You keep your storage economics; DA adds trust.

Arweave/Filecoin can persist a blob, but their proofs don’t cheaply live on-chain or compose with contracts. That composability is Unibase DA’s structural advantage.


  • Verifiable agent memory — tamper-evident, on-chain-verifiable recall for AI agents. This is the wedge, delivered through Membase (memory SDK/MCP built on DA).
  • Proof-of-Availability for on-chain reputation — a data-availability layer for the ERC-8004 agent-reputation/identity ecosystem (evidence that a claim’s backing data is actually retrievable).
  • Verifiable datasets & model registries — prove a dataset/model without revealing it (commitment proofs), enabling training provenance and data royalties.
  • DA for AI artifacts — weights, LoRA adapters, RAG corpora, and checkpoints with a portable, verifiable availability guarantee.

  • Feels familiar — the SDK is shaped like an object store / vector store, so it drops into AI stacks (LangChain / LlamaIndex / MCP) without learning a new storage model.
  • Proofs are first-class — every object carries a self-verifying, content-addressed name; a client (or contract) can check the on-chain receipt, and availability can be surfaced as a shareable verify link / ✓verified badge in the explorer.
  • Composable — because proofs live on-chain, contracts can gate logic on “is this data provably available?” — access control, lifecycle, pricing, and royalty flows become programmable around verified data.
  • Performant — erasure-coded durability with high-throughput ingest, so real-time context loading and memory updates aren’t bottlenecked.

Verifiability should anchor to real needs — agent marketplaces, portable/ownable memory, on-chain reputation, regulated AI, data royalties — not decentralization theater. Unibase DA states plainly where trust lands: on the Honest-One fraud-proof game and the security of the settlement chain (Base, with Ethereum as the security anchor), not on a trusted committee.


Unibase DA is the verifiability layer for AI memory and data:

  • ✅ Proofs of untampered, available, auditable data — enforced on-chain (ZK + Honest-One)
  • ✅ An overlay over any storage backend — trust added, not bytes owned
  • ✅ Composable: availability is a first-class on-chain fact contracts can consume
  • ✅ Powers verifiable agent memory (Membase), 8004 availability, dataset/model provenance, and AI-artifact DA

The goal isn’t cheaper storage — it’s memory you can prove, own, and compose.